storytime sunday (monday edition), 02/11/13 — When you don’t share the story

Last night some of the workers from Magically Real HQ had dinner with some family members. Being Jewish, we did some complaining, some eating, and then we did some talking about other family members (don’t worry – it wasn’t any of YOU).

During that meal, I remembered a story I wrote about a distant relative. This distant relative was mean, arrogant, oppressive, and obnoxious. I wrote a fairy tale about this person where they come to a bad end in Oslo Norway.

courtesy http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/02/us/new-york-the-scream
courtesy http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/02/us/new-york-the-scream

It was a pretty good story but I was never able to place it.

Years later this person has had all sorts of problems and setbacks. I’m not sorry I wrote the story, but I’m glad it never got published.

Sometimes telling, but not sharing the story is the right way to go. This is not to say that injustice shouldn’t be named and unfairness shouldn’t be identified. And Horrible Acts should be shown to be Horrible. But sometimes, it’s perhaps a good idea to write that mean story about that mean person, and just KEEP it.

And maybe use some element of it for something else.

Here’s wishing everyone a happy week filled with judicious, effective narrative choices.

courtesy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lips_Are_Sealed
courtesy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lips_Are_Sealed

4 thoughts on “storytime sunday (monday edition), 02/11/13 — When you don’t share the story

    1. Thanks for posting! I don’t know if such books should be “destroyed.” Maybe yes, if you name names in them and people will immediately recognize themselves or others. On the other hand, maybe you should just sit on them for a bit, til you forget what exactly you were writing about, and then salvage the details.

      1. A book that was written and should have been destroyed was my first attempt at a novel. But to get back to your post, I think you were right not to publicize the original story. Maybe though, there’s another aspect to it. You mentioned the person fell on hard times later on. Now it gets interesting, not for revenge purposes, but for an opportunity to explore the character in greater depth (fictionalized of course). Maybe there’s a story now; maybe not.

  1. haha! I’ll bet your first novel was good. I still love my first novel AND my second. But yes, that’s a great point about thinking about that character and perhaps revisiting him — fictionally of course! thanks very much for your thought!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s